FBT Q&A ‘ Contribution towards employer FBT liability

This is a feature article available to the public. For access to all articles from TaxEd, please click here to become a member.


We have an employee provided with a car fringe benefit by way of a novated lease who chose not to contribute post tax employee contributions during the FBT period. This has resulted in a large FBT liability and associated reportable fringe benefits amount.  The employee in question repaid us the FBT liability in May prior to lodgement of our FBT return.  Can we use the repayment of this money as the contribution to remove the FBT liability and subsequent reportable fringe benefit amount?


The term ‘recipient’s payment’ as is applies to determining the taxable value of a car fringe benefit reads as follows:

‘in a case where expenses were incurred to the provider or employer during the holding period by recipients of the car fringe benefits by way of consideration for the provision of the car fringe benefits — the amount of those expenses paid by the recipients less any amount paid or payable to the recipients by way of reimbursement of those expenses’

Our concern is that the contribution made by the employer towards the employers FBT liability cannot be regarded as a recipient’s payment with the effect of reducing the taxable value of the car benefit provided.

The effect of section 136A of the FBT Act is that any amount paid in respect of FBT cannot also constitute consideration for the provision of a fringe benefit or any other matter. This means that an employee who bears the whole or part of an employer’s FBT liability has not made a recipient’s contribution which would have the effect of reducing the taxable value of a fringe benefit.

Disclaimer: This article is based upon information available as at the time of publishing and may be subject to change.